BEST BUY • 2025

Improving the Best Buy Help Centre Experience

Improving the Best Buy Help Centre Experience

OVERVIEW

This project is a slice of a broader initiative to reduce avoidable customer contacts by making policy and “how-to” help topics easier to find and act on.


This case study focuses on the Help Centre experience (home, category, article, and a new search flow) and on de-emphasizing high-cost escalation paths (phone) in favour of self-serve and chat.

SKILLS

DISCOVERY RESEARCH

ANALYTICS ANALYSIS

INFORMATION ARCHITECTURE

INTERACTION DESIGN

ROLE

PRODUCT DESIGNER

TIMELINE

Q2 2025

PROBLEM SPACE

The existing Help Centre under-served self-serve customers and over-exposed phone/chat:

Strong “Contact Us” promotion

Prominent chat/call CTAs appeared on most help pages, priming escalation.

No search on the Help Centre

Users needed to scan dense category lists.

Cost mix

Phone is significantly more expensive than chat; both are more costly than self-serve.

Goals were to reduce avoidable contacts; shift mix away from phone.

Research & Discovery

I analyzed Help Centre traffic using Adobe to understand how customers arrived and where they dropped off. Additionally I met with our customer care lead to understand the most common topics they were getting calls on.


Afterwards, I benchmarked against competitors like Amazon and Walmart to ideate areas we could iterate on.

Key findings

SEO is a primary entry path. A large share of visits land on article pages and “Contact Us” from Google (returns, order status, shipping queries).

“Contact Us” was over-earning attention. Its placement and visual weight made escalation feel like the default next step.

Most visited pages top heavy on these topics. "Return/exchange policies for different product types" and "information about their order".

RESULTS

Business goal was to deflect avoidable contacts without hurting the experience; early signals suggest we’re bending cost while preserving a clear path to help.

~40% of home page visitors engage with Popular help topics

Call vs. chat mix shifted from ~70/30 to ~65/35 (phone down, chat up)

Estimated $300k+ annualized savings from channel-mix shift and reduced escalations

Bottom call/chat engagement down ~9% following the de-emphasis pattern; call clickthrough down ≥40%